|
.
. |
Angeles
City Election Protest
|
from
NAMFREL Election Monitor Vol.2, No.11
|
. |
Within ten days after the May 10, 2010
elections, former Angeles City Mayor Francis Nepomuceno filed an
electoral protest against Edgardo Pamintuan, who had just won the
election with a final count of 60,5632 votes against Nepomuceno's
34,105 votes. In his protest, Nepomuceno alleged that Pamintuan's
camp placed identifying marks and other unnecessary words and
expressions in the ballots that caused the PCOS machines to count
the votes in Pamintuan's favor. Nepomuceno also reportedly alleged
that the machines were preprogrammed to count votes for Pamintuan.
However, Pamintuan countered that there is a possibility that it was
Nepomuceno's camp who did the cheating. "They were still in power 46
days after the elections, meaning all the ballot boxes were in their
custody. They were also the ones who identified the supposed
questionable precincts -- the precincts which they may have tampered
with," Pamintuan said. "The cheating happened after the elections
and the cheating was against me." Pamintuan alleged that only
ballots with Nepomuceno's name were not spoiled. Regarding the
charge that the machines were pre-programmed in his favor, Pamintuan
said that it is technically impossible and that the charge actually
questions the entire automated elections.
187 precincts were identified by Nepomuceno in his protest. Early
this month, the Comelec's second division commenced the opening of
the ballot boxes in question. On May 16, the Comelec suspended the
revision process after having only opened four ballot boxes, saying
that there were massive discrepancies between the results in the
automated election returns and the votes as reflected on the
physical ballots. Comelec Second Division chair Lucenito Tagle has
suggested checking on the election results reflected on the compact
flash cards (CFCs) used by the PCOS machines as per revision rules,
to which Nepomuceno's camp objected. Tagle cited discrepancies
between the ballot images obtained from the CFCs and the original
ballots which were transported from the city hall here to the
Comelec central office for the recount. He cited reports from
members of his division’s committee on revision that ovals intended
for mayoral vote on the ballots were shaded for more than one
candidate for mayor, thus supposedly voiding the vote. Corresponding
photo images of the ballots, however, showed no such over-voting.
Tagle admitted that the tampered ballots examined so far did not
seem to affect votes for Nepomuceno.
On May 20, Nepomuceno unexpectedly announced the withdawal of his
petition against Pamintuan, citing lack of funds to continue with
the protest. Pamintuan, however, said Nepomuceno's withdrawal of the
case will not stop him from filing charges of electoral fraud and
sabotage. He said they have evidence of massive tampering of the
ballots after the elections in the precincts Nepomuceno's camp
precisely pointed to as having questionable results. "These
evidences reveal a sinister operation conducted while the ballots
and ballot boxes were still in the custody of Nepomuceno before
officially turning them over to me on June 30, 2010," Pamintuan
said.
(Sources: SunStar, PhilStar) |
|
|
|
.
.
. |
|
|
|
|
|