|
.. |
Internet
voting: the Estonian system
|
by Paolo B. Maligaya, NAMFREL Senior
Operations Associate |
from
NAMFREL Election Monitor Vol.2, No.22
|
. |
Out of the estimated 11 million overseas Filipino workers, only half
a million registered for the 2010
elections, and only about 26% of those who registered actually cast
their votes, a very low turnout
indeed considering that around 80% of Filipinos turned out to vote
in May 2010. Filipinos abroad decry
the difficulty of access to voting centers to register and vote, as
well as the difficulty of taking time out
from work to travel for these activities. The Philippine government
also does not allow all Filipino
overseas workers to vote by mail; personal appearance in Philippine
embassies and consulates is a
requirement. Most significantly, Filipinos abroad are also being
required to submit an affidavit stating
that they will return to the country within 3 years after
registration to resume permanent residency, an
impractical and absurd requirement that further discourages most
overseas Filipinos from participating
in our elections entirely: the penalty for not following this
stipulation is disenfranchisement and even
jail time.
The Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003 would need to be
amended to repeal this
requirement.
With the start of voters registration for overseas Filipino workers
on November 2, and in recognition of
the significant number of potential voters abroad, there has been
talk of the possibility of allowing
Filipinos abroad to register and vote through the internet. While it
may be easy to say that all it takes
to vote electronically is a computer and an internet connection, the
country might not be equipped
enough to handle internet voting at this time.
Consider the experience of Estonia, the country most successful in
implementing internet voting.
Estonia was the first nation to hold legally binding general
elections over the internet in 2005. Internet
voting, wherein the votes are encrypted and are transmitted through
a secure system, is meant to
supplement, not replace, the traditional method of voting. It was
declared a success by Estonian
election officials.
. |
The Estonian internet voting system utilizes the
country's national ID card -- mandatory for all citizens 15
years and older to have -- which is used as a national
identity document as well as a smart card that can be
used for transactions with the government. By March
2007, over 1.08 million cards have been issued (the
country's population now stands at 1.34 million). It
should be noted that while the national ID is mandatory
for Estonia's citizens, and is being used in government
transactions, the country has been cited as one of the
top five countries in terms of privacy from government
surveillance, and has also topped the State of World
Liberty Index in 2009.
To vote, voters would need to insert their card into a card reader
installed in their computers, then
access the webpage for voting. For the 2011 parliamentary election,
mobile phones were also used in
e-voting, through SMS and the use of the ID card's PIN; a computer
with internet connection was still
required though to complete the process. |
|
.
In the Estonian system: |
-
|
Internet voting is available during an early voting period (tenth
day to sixth day prior to the main
Election Day); |
-
|
Voters
can change their electronic votes an
unlimited number of times during the
prescribed period,with only the
final vote to be tabulated; |
- |
It
is possible for anyone who votes
using the internet to vote at a
polling station during the early
voting period, invalidating their
internet vote; |
-
|
However, it is not possible to
change or annul the electronic vote
on the main Election Day. The list
of voters who voted electronically
are sent to the polling stations,
and those who had already cast their
votes electronically are not allowed
to vote again. |
|
. |
|
In 2007, 30,275 Estonians voted through the internet during the
general elections. For the 2009 local
municipal elections, 104,415, or almost 10% of registered voters,
used internet voting. In the March
2011 parliamentary elections, 140,846 citizens (or 24.3% of those
who voted) cast their votes
electronically. The total number of voters who voted was 580,264
(out of 913,346 voting-age citizens).
The Estonian system is not perfect though. The OSCE (Organization
for Security and Cooperation in
Europe), in their report on the 2011 parliamentary elections in
Estonia, raised some minor concerns on
the technical aspect of the internet voting system (Read the report
here: http://www.osce.org/odihr/77557). One student had also sought that
the results of the election be
nullified due to an alleged flaw in the election software that could
block votes given to certain
candidates. The complaint was
rejected though by Estonia's supreme
court.
It is clear that the Estonian system of internet voting could not be
wholly adopted for the Philippines at
this time. The country lacks a national ID system, due to the high
cost of having one and the strong
opposition from the public. The Estonian voting population is also
very minuscule compared with the
Philippines'. Estonia is one of the smallest member-nations of the
EU (1.34 million population) and has
the highest GDP per person among former Soviet republics. The
country also has a strong egovernment
program, with strong emphasis on the use of modern technology in
government
operations. Most significantly, Estonia is also ranked highly for
press freedom, economic freedom,
democracy and political freedom, and education. The education system
of Estonia gives much
emphasis on modern technology; the creators of Skype, Hotmail, and
Kazaa all came from Estonia.
However, despite limitations, the Comelec and other concerned
agencies are encouraged to do their
best in seeking the best way to enable overseas Filipinos to cast
their votes, in the least amount of
effort and in the most cost-effective way possible.
For more information on electronic voting in Estonia, go to the
Estonian National Electoral
Committee's excellent website (http://www.vvk.ee/?lang=en) that
gives details on the process. |
|
|
.
.
. |
|
|
|
|
|